A rapper known for her larger-than-life personality is taking a rideshare company to court after a disappointing experience involving one of its drivers. The artist, Dajua Blanding, who goes by the name Dank Demoss, said she was not allowed a ride because of her size.
The incident unraveled on January 18, when Dajua ordered a Lyft to head to her cousin’s place to enjoy a football game together. When the driver, identified only as John Doe, arrived at her Detroit-area home, the situation did not unfold as she expected.
A video shared on TikTok reveals Blanding having an exchange with the driver, who claims his car would struggle to accommodate her.
Blanding asked, “What makes you think I can’t fit in this car?” to which the driver responded, “I’ve got very tired tires.” The conversation touched on space issues as the driver pointed to his car’s limited rear seating capacity. Soon after, he canceled the ride and left, leaving Blanding feeling uncomfortable and unfairly treated.
‘Too Big to Fit’
Feeling her rights had been overlooked, Blanding decided to take action and filed a lawsuit against both Lyft and the unnamed driver on January 27. The lawsuit alleges that her civil rights were infringed upon when the driver denied her entry into his vehicle.
According to reports, the driver had locked his car doors and tried to leave as Blanding approached, telling her she was “too big to fit” and suggesting she opt for a Lyft XL, which offers larger vehicles suitable for more passengers.
Blanding insists she has never needed to book a larger vehicle before, expressing confidence in fitting comfortably inside standard ride options.
‘Discrimination’
Her attorney, John Marko, offers a compelling argument, stating that denying service based on weight is similar to discrimination on the grounds of race or religion, which remains unacceptable in today’s society. Fellow lawyer Zach Runyan emphasized the potential dangers of refusing someone transportation, suggesting the outcome could have been more severe had Blanding been left in a less safe location.
Social media and online forums sparked debates, where various perspectives were shared regarding the driver’s decision. Some agreed with the driver’s choice, citing potential safety concerns for both car and passenger.
Car Was Too Small
Online opinions were divided. Many users voiced that the vehicle’s size and capability could risk the safety of the ride if overloaded.
One commenter lamented that the dispute was being used for monetary gain, while others supported the driver’s professional discretion to prioritize road safety.
A member of the online community mentioned her personal experiences, stating, “When I order a Lyft, I double-check vehicle size preferences for comfort. It just makes sense.”
Emotional Distress
Blanding is seeking not just compensation for the emotional and mental turmoil experienced but also the recovery of any additional legal expenses incurred in the pursuit of this case.
Lyft has responded, affirming its commitment to fighting discrimination and promoting respectful interactions within its service community. The company has reserved its further comments pending legal proceedings.
This unfolding case might pave the way for pivotal changes in the rideshare industry, touching on community guidelines, vehicle assignments, and more.
How do you feel about the driver’s decision to refuse Blanding a ride? We invite you to share your thoughts and discuss this topic with others!
