The nation was abuzz as Donald Trump’s recent oath-taking ceremony caught widespread attention. The surprising element? An apparent oversight where Trump did not place his hand on the two Bibles available during the proceedings.

These weren’t just any Bibles. One was provided by his mother, steeped in personal significance, and the other was the historic Lincoln Bible. Standing beside President Trump was First Lady Melania, holding the revered texts. Even with these symbols of tradition so near, Trump opted to keep his hand at his side, refraining from touching them.

This unexpected behavior stirred conversations globally. Was it an intentional act, or merely a moment of forgetfulness in the heat of the moment?

Supporters of the newly inaugurated president suggested that the entire affair felt hurried. With the agenda slipping behind schedule, perhaps the omission was nothing more than a product of the rush.

Yet, many of Trump’s critics are unconvinced. The sight of him standing there, his left arm hanging by his side while raising his right to take the oath, raised eyebrows and questions about tradition.

Such actions led observers to muse whether this could signify a departure from the age-old customs associated with the office of the President.

Adding another layer to the discussion, some have pointed fingers at Chief Justice John Roberts. Critics argue that his role in the delays could have set off a chain reaction, compressing the schedule and inadvertently leading Trump to neglect the symbolic gesture.